I suggest a campaign about ...

Nuclear waste can be burned to provide all of the UK's energy for 500 years.

For every one of us who worries about the future of meeting the UK's energy needs, there are several thousand self-centred individuals who don't care one iota about carbon targets and climate change, as long as the energy is there 24/7.

There is only one technology that can supply every individual on the planet with an energy-rich lifestyle, for all of time, even when there are 9 billion of us. It is that of the breeder-reactor. In the not too distant future, our lives will be dominated by the decline of hydrocarbon resources and many others. To avoid international confrontations from energy, water or food wars, worldwide deployment of breeder-reactors is inevitable. Global warming will not prove to be the only driving issue.

The tragedy of today’s UK politics is that the technology of the breeder reactor is here and now, in the form of the GE Hitachi Power Block. It is safe and economic, but it is being ignored in favour of ridiculously expensive and ineffectual renewable and ‘’yesterday’s’ nuclear. Authorities have already stated that there is no significant impediment to the UK licensing the GE Hitachi PRISM Power Block technology. GEH say they can build the first one in 5 years.

So an enlightened Government, prepared to drop the mollifying mish-mash of the current energy policy, could have the first of this unique type of nuclear power plant up and running in under 10 years. At the moment, one is under consideration to 'burn' our plutonium stockpile, as it generates 622 MW of commercial electricity, over a period of 50 years plus. So the first one would solve the proliferation problem.

We then have 35,000 tonnes of depleted uranium plus all of the existing, and still to be created, spent nuclear fuel, which these power plant can also 'burn'. That's enough fuel to power the UK for 500 years, using a fleet of these reactors. So that's the energy security problem solved.

They emit no greenhouse gases. So that's the carbon targets met, with ease.

The minuscule amount of nuclear waste they produce, decays to background radiation levels in 300 years - easily, cheaply and safely stored. So the problem of storing long-lived nuclear waste, for mega-thousands of years, is also resolved.

These reactors are inherently safe - under accident conditions, such as complete loss of power, they shut down according to the laws of physics. They are passively safe - under accident conditions, such as the disabling of all safety systems, they shut down without human intervention. Natural or man-made conditions experienced at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima, would result in these reactors undergoing benign shutdowns.

What a unique opportunity for the UK to lead the rest of the world into the era of the breeder-reactor. The plant and equipment is made from stainless steel and operates at atmospheric pressure, meaning that UK companies with the expertise and capacity, such as Rolls-Royce, could manufacture these reactors in their entirety. We are so well placed to negotiate manufacturing licences with GEH and the UK would move into a period of manufacturing growth and prosperity, we have not seen in at least 3 generations.

Make sure your MP gets to know about this opportunity for the country. Email your MP through: http://prismsuk.blogspot.co.uk/

53 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Colin MegsonColin Megson shared this idea  ·   ·  Admin →

    5 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • Angry of AngleseyAngry of Anglesey commented  · 

        As stated by Anonymous · June 9 - I agree.

        Max Priesemann · May 17, - you illustrate the problem perfectly- people are scared of thing they don’t understand.

        Politicians gave us the problems of toxic nuclear waste disposal in the 1960s when they only allowed work on reactors that produced weapons grade plutonium.
        Grubby little self seeking politicians shouldn’t be allowed to make decisions on something as important as energy security .

      • Anonymous commented  · 

        Good luck with this, sadly 38 Degrees has been hijacked by the green lobby and follows all the nonsense spouted about carbon budgets, wind turbines and the like.

      • Max PriesemannMax Priesemann commented  · 

        Wonder why nobody has done this if it is soooo great.
        Have you heard about the perpetuum mobile? Your proposal is just another example of it. Turning waste into energy without any waste left??? It's a joke! The left over waste will even be more toxic!

      • Andrew CoupeAndrew Coupe commented  · 

        To the commenter below (anonymous): did you read Colin's proposal? It is to *use* the existing nuclear waste to power this safer form of reactor. The design of the reactor is such that you *can't* have a Chernobyl-style accident.

        This proposal helps to deal with the nuclear waste produced (it's the fuel for these reactors) and provides our energy requirements for the foreseeable future without burning fossil fuels.

        The only reason you wouldn't vote for it is because you don't understand it.

      • Anonymous commented  · 

        Well that's great as long as you don't have any accidents or mishaps. If you do, then Britain is too small to absorb them. If there was an accident the size of Chernobyl then that would make most of England uninhabitable. Although the risk of that happening may be miniscule, the consequences would be too great. The nuclear industry has a very bad record on the disposal of nuclear waste. The cost is billions. I understand that some stored nuclear waste in USA is now leaking and causing a high level of concern. Where do you propose to store the nuclear waste? No-one in UK wants it. Do you propose to ride roughshod over democracy to force it on local areas such as the Lake District? Let's deal with our current nuclear waste problem before creating any more!

      Feedback and Knowledge Base