I suggest a campaign about ...

Save Barn Elms from Thames Waters Plans to construct the super sewers main drive shaft

We are a coalition of residents, councils, MPs and GLA members joining forces to defend an unspoilt stretch of the River Thames riverbank from seven years of construction misery.

Alistair McGowan, Peter Snow and Caroline Langrishe are among the high profile names backing the pressure group's campaign.

We are opposed to Thames Water's plans to construct the main shaft of the proposed Thames Tunnel at Barn Elms.
We believe there are alternative sites which offer less impact to our community, wildlife & quality of life for local residents!
Thames Water wants to choose Barn Elms playing fields, between Putney & Barnes to build one of only two ‘MAIN DRIVE SHAFT SITES’ required to drill the Thames Super Sewer Tunnel.
The work will be continuous for 7 years minimum A cleaner Thames is needed, but a Main Drive Shaft Site should be built on industrial land, not a unique area that includes a Special Site of Metropolitan Interest & Bat Corridor & protected trees (the towpath), close to a National Site of Special Scientific Interest (The Wetland Centre).
Barn Elms is adjacent to one of the most famous and unique stretches of river in the world (home of the University Boat Race), the Embankment Conservation Area, is close to homes and businesses, and is used as sports fields by at least 10 schools. Access to the river and towpath will be restricted during construction. The area could be disrupted by up to 10 trucks per hour accessing the site 24/7 and by arc lit construction at night.

Take action against this. Pls fill in
www.gopetition.com/petition/40513html or go to http://www.stoptheshaft.org or Stop the Shaft (SaveBarnElms) on Twitter or contact us at tunnel.putney@gmail.com
LET’S HELP THAMES WATER, WANDSWORTH AND RICHMOND COUNCILS AND PLA FIND A MORE SUITABLE SITE… BEFORE THE DAMAGE IS DONE FOREVER - we only have until the end of Aug to object.

652 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Stop the Shaft Stop the Shaft shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    140 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • RolandGRolandG commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        The actual current figure is nearer £4.2Bn over 7 years. The TW proposals will not solve the problems and are unsustainable. TW have admitted it will be full most of the time and will back up and overflow in the predicted exceptional rainfall events resulting from global warming. It would have cost about £7.2Bn over 12 years to seperate sewage from rain/surface water and if started when it should have been, it would have been finished by now. The annual cost to bill payers would have been the same but TW would have far less effluent to treat and thus lower bills for us in perpetuity.

      • FoyezFoyez commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        You can take part in the consultation process here. http://www.thamestunnelconsultation.co.uk/

        At rising cost, now 4.1 billion to erect this tunnel it is clearly not the best option. Other more sustainable methods can be used to ensure sewage from combined-sewage overflows does not get deposited in the Thames. For example the use of sustainable urban drainage which will create more green areas.

      • Rosemary HRosemary H commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        We need to protect our green spaces - please visit my proposal to protect a priceless range of hills!

      • J MurphyJ Murphy commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        An alternative should be found; seems a ridiculous proposal. All the sports fields will surely lose out if this goes ahead

      • John bannisterJohn bannister commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        What a shame if this project, with all the associated disruption, was to
        proceed. It would take away the one place I can find some peace and
        calm in this hectic life of this area. Please stop it happening.
        Many thanks.

      • J DriverJ Driver commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Which Londoners would use any of this fabulous area with such a huge installation sticking well out into the river, across the towpath and dominating the playing fields? We would lose all these recreation spaces. It will make several sporting clubs totally uneconomic and they will fold for good. River usage will become much more dangerous right where it is most active. Why should Londoners lose all this to save money for a private, mostly foreign-owned, company when a brown field site is available?

      • andiandi commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Please don't wreck an area that brings so much pleasure to so many. It just doesn't make any sense.

      • Nick AldridgeNick Aldridge commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Spend a tiny bit more money by putting it on one of the brownfield industrial sites available, and do a lot less damage.

      • claireclaire commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        save barn elms. my kids love it and this will also affect my sons beaver hut and they will be devastated. The childrens bedroom also over looks it and i want my children to have good night sleeps and dont want this to then effect there school education levels, as they will be disturbed by the hurdious noise.

      • Sarah BSarah B commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        While we need to allow for the necessity of improving the sewerage infrastructure, there is no need to disprupt the hugely valuable green spaces in the city. Brownfield sites have to be a realistic alternative.

      • AnonymousAnonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        It is unthinkable that this could be built on such an unsuitable site for so many reasons - if it must be built then it should be on industrial land away from so many fragile areas of natural beauty and wildlife.

      • AnonymousAnonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        This should be constructed on a brownfield site and certainly not near Wetlands, protected trees, the Embankment Conservation area, a famous and beautiful stretch of river, not to mention homes and sports fields.

      • stephen barnesstephen barnes commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Find a brownfield site that doesn'nt have sport pitches and clubs on it...

        Thousands of people will be affected by using Barn Elms, just beacuse the public can't see them from the footpath doesn't mean they're not there!

      • Roger DennisRoger Dennis commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Our family has walked the towpath in this area and visited the Wetlands Centre many times. My son played football on both Barn Elms sites. The shaft would cause unacceptable disruption to a wonderful area of London and I fully support the campaign to stop it.

      ← Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7

      Feedback and Knowledge Base